“…the total amount of energy used by the building on an annual basis is equal to the amount of renewable energy created on the site…”
Net Zero buildings have always intrigued me. It would be a dream come to true to work on one of these ground ups. I cannot imagine how exciting it would be to manage the Facilities side. When looking at a new TI, I incorporate the concept where it is feasible. However, with existing pre-conservation infrastructure, it falls short. I suppose there is something to be said for, “every little bit helps” but it is not as satisfying. Even so, it remains a good practice and models the smallest of conservation efforts on all levels.
We all know being green is not cheap as initial costs are typically higher than conventional construction. Even with the most robust harvesting and conservation design, net zero efforts will fall short if occupant behavior is not aligned. Those occupying the space must be on the same page. Human behavior makes or breaks the success of any initiative. If they are not bought in, all the money, time and good intentions are in vain.
Net Zero construction, also known as Zero Energy (ZE), is a multifaceted initiative. There are a lot of moving parts and as with most things of this caliber, controversy is plentiful. This post is intended to be a limited, cursory informational highlight and is certainly not exhaustive.
You can find more information at Energy.Gov. As well as within this video on a Zero Energy School in Arlington County, Virginia.
10.20
